Blaze Design Partner Pilot
A 90-day structured engagement with select enterprise partners to validate, refine, and accelerate the Blaze platform roadmap through real-world deployment.
Program Objectives
Platform-Market Fit
Confirm that Blaze's agentic SDLC model solves real pain points in regulated enterprise environments at scale.
Product Roadmap
Shape the next 12-month feature roadmap based on direct partner feedback, usage patterns, and integration requirements.
Measurable ROI
Generate quantified evidence of DORA metric improvement, compliance automation, and developer productivity gains.
Success Criteria — Program Level
Go / No-Go Decision by Day 90
Each partner reaches a clear proceed-to-contract or structured-exit decision at program close. No ambiguity in outcome.
Evidence Package Produced
Every partner engagement produces a quantified case study — baseline metrics, 90-day results, compliance score delta, and developer NPS shift.
Roadmap Influence Documented
A minimum of 5 prioritized feature requests from partner feedback are incorporated into the next release cycle.
Reference Customer Pipeline
At least 2 of 3–5 partners convert to reference customers willing to participate in sales conversations within 120 days of program close.
Ideal Partner Profile
Design partners are selected for fit, not just interest. The program is structured to generate signal, not noise — that requires partners with the right organizational context.
▮ Mandatory Criteria
-
Enterprise scale
1,000+ employees; active software delivery organization with a defined SDLC process (however informal). -
Regulated industry
Financial services, healthcare, insurance, government, or defense. Active compliance obligations (SOC 2, HIPAA, FedRAMP, PCI-DSS, or equivalent). -
50+ active developers
Minimum developer headcount to generate statistically meaningful DORA and NPS signal within 90 days. -
Executive sponsor committed
VP Engineering or CTO-level sponsor with authority to allocate developer time and make a contract decision at Day 90. -
Active AI initiative
Existing investment in AI tooling (GitHub Copilot, Cursor, internal LLM tooling) signals organizational readiness for agentic SDLC.
▭ Strong Signal Factors
-
Active audit pressure
Upcoming SOC 2 Type II audit, regulatory exam, or board-level compliance review creates urgency to automate evidence collection. -
Developer NPS pain
Current developer satisfaction below 30 — friction from manual process, review bottlenecks, or audit overhead is acute and felt by engineers. -
Monorepo or multi-service architecture
Cross-cutting compliance enforcement and multi-agent orchestration deliver the most value in complex, multi-service environments. -
Python or TypeScript primary stack
Enforcement tooling and agent-generated code are optimized for Python and TypeScript. Other stacks are supported but generate less immediate signal. -
Strategic AI partnership interest
Willingness to be a public reference, provide testimonial, or co-present at an industry event post-program is a strong long-term alignment signal.
Disqualifying Factors
90-Day Engagement Structure
Three sequential phases, each with defined deliverables and a formal checkpoint before the next phase begins.
Onboarding & Baseline
Establish the deployment, integrate with existing toolchain, and capture baseline metrics before Blaze influences any workflows.
- Kickoff: sponsor alignment + team onboarding session
- EKS cluster provisioning + Blaze platform deployment
- ADO / GitHub / Jira integration configured
- Baseline DORA metrics captured (last 90 days of history)
- Developer NPS survey — pre-Blaze baseline
- Compliance posture assessment — current evidence gaps
- First feature delivered via full Blaze SDLC workflow
- Team training: agents, skills, enforcement model
- Phase 1 checkpoint review with sponsor
Adoption & Metrics
Expand to full team usage, track adoption velocity, and begin collecting quantified improvement data against the Day 14 baseline.
- All active developers using Blaze for new feature work
- Compliance evidence collection fully automated
- Weekly sync: adoption blockers + friction points logged
- Mid-program DORA snapshot vs. baseline
- Mid-program developer NPS survey
- Phase 2 checkpoint + roadmap influence session
- Feature requests logged to Blaze roadmap backlog
- Integration requests triaged and prioritized
- Compliance score tracked weekly
Evaluation & Decision
Final metrics collection, ROI quantification, and the structured go/no-go decision. Every engagement ends with a clear outcome.
- Final DORA metrics captured and delta calculated
- End-of-program developer NPS survey
- Compliance score final report generated
- ROI case study drafted and reviewed with partner
- Contract terms presented (if proceeding)
- Structured exit terms presented (if not proceeding)
- Quarterly business review with executive sponsor
- Go / no-go decision recorded and documented
- Reference customer agreement signed (if applicable)
What We Measure
Four primary metrics form the quantified success framework. Targets are set at program kickoff using the Day 14 baseline. All targets represent minimums — not aspirational numbers.
| Metric | Baseline | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment Frequency | measured Day 14 | +30% higher |
| Lead Time for Changes | measured Day 14 | −30% reduction |
| Change Failure Rate | measured Day 14 | −25% reduction |
| Mean Time to Recovery | measured Day 14 | −30% reduction |
| Dimension | Target |
|---|---|
| Evidence collection automation | 100% of new work items |
| Phase gate adherence | ≥ 95% of PRs |
| Security review coverage | 100% of code changes |
| Audit readiness score | +40 points vs. baseline |
| Survey Touchpoint | Goal |
|---|---|
| Day 14 baseline survey | establish reference score |
| Day 60 mid-program survey | +10 pts minimum |
| Day 90 final survey | +20 pts minimum |
| Qualitative feedback | 3+ quotable testimonials |
| Cost Category | Target Reduction |
|---|---|
| PR review cycle time | −40% |
| Compliance evidence prep | −70% (automated) |
| Security review overhead | −50% |
| CI/CD infrastructure cost | −30% (agent-driven) |
Partner Benefits
Design partners receive benefits unavailable through any other channel. The program is deliberately high-touch — Blaze invests significantly in each partner's success.
Design Partner Agreement Highlights
Participate in weekly syncs, mid-program survey, and final QBR. Minimum 1 hour/week of sponsor time.
Share anonymized DORA metrics for aggregate benchmarking. No proprietary code or business data required.
If the program succeeds (metrics met), partner agrees to a reference conversation with one qualified prospect per quarter.
How We Work Together
The engagement model is designed for enterprise rhythm — structured enough to generate signal, lightweight enough to fit alongside normal development work.
Communication Channels
Shared Artifacts & Deliverables
| Artifact | Owner | Cadence |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption metrics dashboard | Blaze | Live / continuous |
| DORA snapshot report | Blaze | Day 14, 60, 90 |
| Compliance score report | Blaze | Weekly |
| Feature request log | Shared | Ongoing (async) |
| Developer NPS survey | Shared | Day 14, 60, 90 |
| Weekly sync notes | Shared | Weekly |
| Integration requirements doc | Partner | Day 1–7 (onboarding) |
| Day 90 ROI case study | Blaze | Day 85 (draft for review) |
What Blaze Commits To
- Named CSE for full 90 days
- Response to blockers within 4 business hours
- Weekly compliance score report, no delays
- Feature requests triaged within 2 weeks
- Day 90 case study delivered on schedule
What Partners Commit To
- Attend weekly sync (tech lead or delegate)
- Executive sponsor available for monthly briefings
- Developer participation in NPS surveys (≥ 70% response)
- Day 90 go/no-go decision — no indefinite deferrals
- Honest feedback on friction points and blockers
Escalation Path
- L1: Dedicated CSE (Slack, < 4 hours)
- L2: Engineering team (P0 blockers, < 1 business day)
- L3: Blaze leadership (sponsor-level, monthly briefing)
- Emergency: Direct CTO contact for data or security issues
- SLA review at every monthly briefing